An (incomplete) SWOT Analysis

A good start in sizing up an organization’s situation and crafting a strategy is the so-called SWOT analysis, which appraises a company’s resource strengths and weaknesses and its external opportunities and threats.

Orchestras share many strengths and opportunities, but also weaknesses and threats. Below, you will find a SWOT analysis focusing on general features. Many of these concepts are liberally taken from “Strategy: Core Concepts, Analytical Tools, Readings” by Thompson, Gamble and Strickland.

Strengths
Resources that enhances an organization’s competitiveness

Materials and media

Engaged and involved audience

Established sites and places

Weaknesses
Shortcomings in resources, representing competitive liabilities

Financial resources

Human resources

Contracts and Copyright

Opportunities
Market prospects that can grow and profit an organization

Openings to exploit emerging new technologies

Expanding into new geographic markets and serving additional market segments

Openings to win market share from rivals

Entering into alliances or joint ventures to expand the organization’s market coverage

Threats
External forces that are a risk to an organization’s competitive well-being

Cluttered environment

Ever changing landscape

Demographic structure

These four lists—different for every organization or orchestra—show what conclusions can be drawn concerning the state of the company’s position and call for actions to improve the company’s strategy. Thompson, Gamble and Strickland recommend the following:

This SWOT analysis is therefore not done, but I will leave it to each individual organization to create its own set of lists, draw its own conclusions and determine its own course of action. This brief and incomplete analysis merely serves as a guide and as a provoker of thought on orchestras and new media.

Source: Thompson, Arthur, John Gamble and A.J. Strickland. “Strategy: Core Concepts, Analytical Tools, Readings” Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2006.

29 July 2008 | Special: Orchestras and New Media | Comments

5 Responses to “An (incomplete) SWOT Analysis”


Comments

  1. 1 Flavia 31 July 2008 @ 3:19 am

    Marc, as you are aware, I love what you are doing here!.

    What I would perhaps add into the SWOT methodology is a “Tools” section as well, and maybe include a membership survey. A survey of both internal and external customers would help you determine what everyone’s expectations are, plus, get a clear(er) picture of each and every point in the SWOT from an external perspective. Especially for a big org like yours, with so many members (a mix of internal and external), you will need to balance both views to produce a sound strategy and probably such a survey would help you outline that.

  2. 2 Marc 31 July 2008 @ 12:57 pm

    Thanks Flavia, excellent suggestion on the survey. I’m sure many orchestras regularly hold patron surveys and can look for information there or work to include specific new media questions in the future.

    I’m interested to learn what exactly you meant with the “tools” section.

  3. 3 Flavia 31 July 2008 @ 1:09 pm

    Hi Marc,

    (I left you another comment this morning in another post that is still pending moderation, by the way. Probably because I included an external link in it).

    By “tools” section, I meant a list of applications that a new Social Media practitioner could use as a reference, a toolbox of sorts (for the SWOT analysis, best survey software, either free or licensed, for the “Blogs” section, best blogging software, etc.). We take these “tools” for granted because we have been using them for a while and have probably been following them from inception. However, people coming from more traditional PR and Marketing roles probably wouldn’t know where to start looking if they need to implement such applications.

    I am currently drafting a proposal for a foundation where the Chairman doesn’t even have a mobile phone and doesn’t see the need for it, considering they have a secretary that relays all important messages. This case might be extreme, but cultural institutions, in many ways, are seriously lagging behind. An ambitious document like the one you are putting together could benefit from including recommendations for these best apps.

  4. 4 Marc 2 August 2008 @ 12:11 pm

    Thanks for the clarification! I am planning to create a list of resources and tools at the end of this series, so stay tuned!

    If you have any suggestions for great tools you are currently using, feel free to post them or to send me an e-mail at dutchperspective (at) mcmvanbree.com. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

  1.  
  2.  
  3.  

Navigation

FeedBurner


View Marc van Bree's profile on LinkedIn

Calendar

Del.icio.us


Flickr

  • Nazi Propaganda Poster: De Ruyter
  • Nazi Propaganda Poster: Bosch
  • Nazi Propaganda Poster: Pens
  • Nazi Propaganda Poster: Theater

Archives

Categories

Search

Add to

Meta

Obama '08